Given that the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has actually been attained, therefore the decision of the Supreme Court needs to generally be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) of the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
A guide to online and print sources of Washington State court opinions, rules, forms, and jury instructions
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this can be a free and democratic state, and once a person becomes a major he / she can marry whosoever he/she likes; When the parents on the boy or Lady do not approve of these inter-caste or interreligious marriage the utmost they could do if they're able to Lower off social relations with the son or the daughter, Nevertheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these kinds of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Woman who's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or guy that's a major, the few is neither harassed by any individual nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who gives this sort of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to endeavor by instituting criminal proceedings through the police against this kind of persons and further stern action is taken against these types of person(s) as provided by legislation.
Acquittal nullifies prior guilt and fortifies petitioners' eligibility for appointment. No juridical impediment to appointment following acquittal. Equivalence of acquittals under compromise and criminal procedure code, plus the role of "badal-i-sulh" in restorative justice. Distinction between probationary release and acquittal. Probationary release as being a legally acknowledged conviction. Read more
thirteen. The Supreme Court has held that when the act of misconduct is founded as well as employee is found guilty after owing process of legislation, it is the prerogative in the employer to decide the quantum of punishment, from the various penalties provided in regulation. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed is not really proportionate with the seriousness of your act of misconduct is not suitable although the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion in a very structured and lawful way. Read more
In order to preserve a uniform enforcement on the laws, the legal system adheres to the doctrine of stare decisis
116 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Cell Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 12 Justice from the Peace u/s 22-A is just not obliged to afford an opportunity of hearing to your accused party; nor obliged to always or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is necessary to consider all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid equipment of criminal legislation from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are a number of the relevant factors. Read more
In federal or multi-jurisdictional regulation systems there may possibly exist conflicts between the assorted reduce appellate courts. Sometimes these differences may not be resolved, and it may be necessary to distinguish how the regulation is applied in one district, province, division or appellate department.
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming for the main case, It is usually a well-established proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is topic on the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings on the evidence.
Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives on the police will be to apprehend offenders, investigate crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and above all, assure legislation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The regulation enjoins the police to get scrupulously fair on the offender and also the Magistracy is to make certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an check here offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court as well as from other Courts, Nevertheless they have failed to have any corrective effect on it.
Under Article 199, the court possesses the authority to review government procedures for reasonableness if applicable in respondent university and to safeguard aggrieved parties' rights. Therefore, this petition is admissible based on proven court precedents, and the respondents' objections are overruled. Read more
If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability during the matter, but couldn't be answerable in any way for their actions. When the court delayed making such a ruling, the defendants took their request for the appellate court.
In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials acting within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case regulation previously rendered on similar cases.
These judicial interpretations are distinguished from statutory legislation, which are codes enacted by legislative bodies, and regulatory legislation, which are established by executive companies based on statutes.